Defining Success Downward?

My new post at the Energy Collective looks at Stephen Chu’s record promoting alternative energy at the Department of Energy:

In his letter of resignation as Secretary of Energy, Steven Chu pointedly rebutted those who have focused attention on the bankruptcies of Solyndra and several other companies given large loans by the Department of Energy. He wrote: “While critics try hard to discredit the program, the truth is that only one percent of the companies of the companies we funded went bankrupt. That one percent has gotten more attention than the 99 percent that have not.”

So let me get this straight: the test of government funding success is that a company manages to avoid bankruptcy after receiving government grants.

It seems a very low bar.

How about this test instead: how much of the support for the remaining companies has actually resulted in products that have been successful in the marketplace without ongoing subsidies?

Advertisements

One comment on “Defining Success Downward?

  1. Isabella
    February 20, 2013 at 6:44 pm #

    This is certainly the third blog post, of your website I went through.

    Nevertheless I actually enjoy this particular one,
    “Defining Success Downward? | Peter Z. Grossman” the best.
    All the best ,Marilynn

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: